forest walks and trains others to become forest therapy guides themselves. Learn from Clotilde’s expertise and take the next step in understanding nature’s therapeutic benefits by enrolling in our course. 🌲
Published on May 29, 2026
Most practitioners hear some version of “I feel stuck in my career” far more often than they say out loud. In one large coaching sample, career concerns were common—which matches what many of us see session after session.
The familiar pattern is this: someone arrives tense, embarrassed, and half-expecting advice they already know they can’t use. If we rush too quickly into tactics, the conversation often hardens. What tends to move things forward is language that lowers threat, restores dignity, and makes one next step feel possible. When that atmosphere is missing, motivation drops and momentum fades.
An Ikigai-informed approach offers structure without turning a person into a problem to fix. Used well, it’s a gentle lens for meaning, fit, contribution, and sustainability. The arc is simple: settle, orient, remember, contribute, and experiment—and in practice, that sequence is often the humane next move people need.
Key Takeaway: Use Ikigai as a gentle, dignity-restoring framework rather than a “purpose verdict.” Start by reducing shame and naming real-life constraints, then surface strengths through specific stories, reconnect direction to contribution, and finish with one small, time-bound experiment that fits the person’s actual bandwidth.
First, help the person feel safe enough to tell the truth. Career stuckness is often less about personal inadequacy and more about misfit or overload. Naming that difference matters—it softens the room and gives the person their dignity back.
A calm, collaborative tone is not “just being nice.” It actively supports engagement. In coaching, warmth predicts engagement, and emotionally supportive conversations often open more doors than a purely directive style.
Here is the kind of opener I use:
It also helps to slow the pace physically. Brief grounding or mindfulness at the beginning of a session can improve self-reflection, so even a single slower breath or a short pause to notice the body can change what becomes possible next.
“Accepting yourself is one of the most important and yet difficult tasks we face in our lives.”
I sometimes offer that line from Ken Mogi gently, then leave space. People often exhale when acceptance enters the conversation. In broader psychological work, acceptance reduces distress and makes change feel more reachable.
If you want a few short phrases ready to hand, these work well:
Once the room has softened, bring in Ikigai lightly. The goal isn’t to declare someone’s purpose in a single sitting; it’s to create a respectful frame for exploration—one that holds both meaning and sustainability.
It’s also worth honoring the cultural roots. In Japan, ikigai is often understood as daily meaning, not only a single career mission. Put simply, that view removes pressure and gives the person room to be honest about what actually fits.
I usually introduce the four familiar areas as prompts rather than answers:
The popular four-circle model can be genuinely helpful—especially when someone’s thinking has become tangled. I present it as a working map, not a rule. Traditional frameworks tend to serve best when used with humility and real-world flexibility, as they do in life direction work.
“Life is not a problem to be solved. Just remember to have something that keeps you busy doing what you love while being surrounded by the people who love you.”
That line from Héctor García often helps people unclench around direction. Instead of forcing certainty, the conversation starts noticing what already carries aliveness, steadiness, and belonging.
After the map comes memory. When someone feels lost, asking them to list strengths often produces silence. Asking for real moments works far better. Research suggests that specific memories build confidence more effectively than abstract affirmations, and strengths-focused career work can increase self-efficacy.
So rather than asking, “What are your strengths?” I ask:
Concrete examples reveal patterns faster than general self-description. In assessment contexts, specific examples tend to give richer information—and the same principle works beautifully in coaching conversations.
As they speak, I often capture each story in three parts:
Think of it like turning fog into footprints. Someone who begins with “I don’t know what I offer” may, within minutes, recognize they calm conflict, simplify complexity, build trust quickly, or spot patterns others miss. Once that recognition lands, direction becomes easier to discuss.
As one student put it, “I learned practices for self reflection and self awareness that I will use and coach others to use for the rest of my life.” That kind of grounded remembering is exactly what this stage is for.
With strengths on the table, the next move is to ask who or what those strengths are for. This is often where energy returns. The question shifts from “What job should I get?” to “Where would my presence matter?”
Purpose-oriented coaching can increase intrinsic motivation, and even brief contact with the people helped by one’s work can increase persistence. Essentially, contribution helps people remember why they cared in the first place.
Questions I like here include:
“Find your own ikigai by asking yourself how you want to serve your community. If you are undecided, remember your dreams from when you were younger.”
That reminder from Tsutomu Hotta opens the conversation beautifully. It ties direction to belonging, memory, and service—rather than status alone.
To make this practical, I often use three simple prompts:
It also helps to translate vague dissatisfaction into a specific mismatch. “I am exhausted by constant urgency.” “I miss being useful in a human-facing way.” “I need more autonomy than this role allows.” Once the mismatch is named, the next experiment often becomes obvious.
A gentle closing prompt for this stage is: “If your work served this person or group, even in a small way, what part of you would breathe easier?”
Clarity deepens through action, not analysis alone. The final step is to co-create one small experiment that fits the person’s actual bandwidth. People are more likely to follow through when next steps are specific, and exploratory career experiences can improve clarity faster than reflection by itself.
I often frame this as a prototype: not a leap, not a reinvention—just a small test that creates real information.
For example:
The co-creation flow sounds something like this:
I like to write it as a short experiment statement:
Planning around practical realities matters. Addressing contextual barriers such as family constraints and finances helps people move forward with less avoidance. The experiment should fit the person’s life as it is today.
“Be led by your curiosity, and keep busy by doing things that fill you with meaning and happiness.”
“If you can make the process of making the effort your primary source of happiness, then you have succeeded in the most important challenge of your life.”
Those reminders, from Héctor García and Ken Mogi, bring the spirit of this final step into focus: follow aliveness, stay modest, and learn by doing.
Used together, these five scripts create a steady progression from shame to agency. First the person settles. Then they gain a kinder frame for where they are. Then they remember what is already true about their strengths. Then they reconnect those strengths to contribution. Finally, they test one next move.
In practice, this is often where momentum returns. People don’t usually leave with a perfect answer; they leave with a truer direction and one action they can complete within a week. Over time, that’s how ikigai tends to emerge—not as a dramatic revelation, but as a quieter orientation toward a life that feels more alive, more useful, and more sustainable.
Apply these five scripts in practice with the Ikigai Coach Certification Course.
Explore Ikigai Coach Course →Thank you for subscribing.