Needs to cite sources
A few studies are mentioned by name, but generally speaking this course does not cite its source material. It is written in a conversational tone at times that seems to be written by a non-native English speaker using a lot of fluff words. I would prefer a course with links to scientific research. Needs to be more in depth.
Boring audio
Boring audio
Not worth the time
Not a reflective course. The information is very limited, it does not provide a holistic view of working with clients. Not providing troubleshooting for challenging conversations. It is rather quite simplistic and constricted. i would not recommend it
Having problems taking quizs and worksheets
Having problems taking quizzes once something is typed in can’t change it
Even with the button clicked to make changes and cannot type in the worksheets pages ! Also when using the audio feature once stop and pause has to start at the beginning of the module each time
confused
Ive had to complete a couple of the tests more than once and its not giving me the results of the. final exam
Not what I was expecting
The course is a pdf document with a short YouTube video to summarize. Though I understand it is an « at your own pace » kind of course I would have appreciated to have a live person teaching the material rather than just having the audio reading the PDF word forward.
Furthermore, the platform is extremely slow, and there are frequent bugs.
Dull
So you read a book and take a test? That's like 2% of what this course COULD be.
this is not what I was expecting
this is not what I was expecting
post module 6
these audios are really hard to stay engaged with
Good introduction course but some major flaws and controversial statements
Overall a good course. I noticed some errors, grammar, punctuation, wording, but also some more serious errors for example : 8 essential essential amino acids, instead of 9. On a more fundamental level, I noticed some serious flaws and contradictions : for example, meat and animal products are nutrient dense, provide all vitamins and minerals, are bioavailable, contain no anti nutrient, but somehow they are bad health because they cause high cholesterol therefore heart disease, rot in the colon therefore colon cancer. It looks like you have a plant based diet agenda, which makes not sense from a pure metabolism point of view. You recommend a vegan diet and vegetarian diet which clearly is lacking in the essential vitamins and minerals, and the bioavailability of those is less compared to animal products. There is no essential carbs. You vilify saturated fat calling lipotoxicity, but you recommend industrial seed oils highly oxidative and poor in omega 3, and present in all the processed foods. It seems like you are using epidemiological and observational science to make your claims which is poor science proving correlation not causation. By the way it would be nice to put your sources. I also noticed some controversial statements and recommendations, such as body detoxification, or body acid-alkaline balance, which is not backed by science. You also fail to talk about anti-nutrients which are a real concern for some people. You fail to talk about FODMAPs which is a proven diet for people with IBS. You fail to recommend the Keto diet despite being the longest most studied diet ever. And recent studies are finding that it is the best diet for lowering insulin resistance, and metabolism dysfunction. You fail to recognize the paleo and carnivore diet, you go as far to recommend adding grains to the paleo diet , why? You fail to mention the benefits of ketones. There is overwhelming evidence from archeological and anthropological data, that first humans ate mostly meat, and our brains have evolved on eating animal fat and animal protein, first raw as scavengers, then cooked. One can clearly see why when considering humans during the last ice age. So why push the grains ? Sugar and carbs create cravings. The will of the mind alone is not gonna solve cravings as you seem to suggest. Recommending obese people to eat 3 meals a day plus snacks composed of mostly carbs is not gonna working as we clearly are seeing. Proteins and fats are what keep people full and not craving sweets : nobody wakes up middle off the night craving a steak. I'm also a student of Holistic management and regenerative farming, and I can tell you that animal raised on pasture produce very nutrient dense foods compared to CAFO meats, on top of capturing carbon, fixing the water cycle, mineral cycle, and enhancing biodiversity, and giving a better life to the farmers. The good thing about this course is that is really pushed me to do some research and see what experts had to say about different topics, which was a process of its own, and fascinating, I learned so much! I am available if you want to reach out. Thank you.
dry course content
I find the delivery of the course to be shallow. Would be much more in line with what it promises if it included multi media rather than just words.....disappointed in delivery of content
hard to stay engaged
depending on your topic the content can be dry and the presentation of it is very text book.
Courses from module 4 doesn't complete from play to tick
Loved the information, but the site is tricky and doesn't complete modules when finished.
Not ND Affirming Format
As a neurodivergent individual, I’ve found the format of the program challenging because it doesn’t support a variety of learning styles, particularly visual learning. At present, the material is presented only as a textbook, which can be read or listened to. While the content itself is affirming and accurate, which I really appreciate, the lack of diverse learning formats makes it harder for me to fully engage with it.
I don't like the format in which the course is delivered.
I wish the material was delivered as a video or an audio-led coaching session. This is not easy to follow.
Spiritual Coaching
Enkoying the course, however struggling with the platform.
