The questions can be more straightforward. They seem to be tripping me up somewhat. Also the course isn’t geared towards grieving as of yet and I’m going into the 4th module (of what may be the 1st set. I’m not sure). Otherwise the content so far has been very interesting and helpful.
It's a very obvious that this is an AI produced course, that being said, I learned a lot, it was quite in depth/throughout and I am using it in supplementation with my other accredited courses.
I feel this was a very informative and useful course. I was surprised that there was not more detail on neuroscience coaching activities. While I see the need for discussinf addiction this was I feel an overly covered aspect as I've not taken this course to become a drug recovery specialist. With so much material on that in this course it might give the impression that this is a possiblity, while is misleading.
For the most part I am really enjoying the course and feel that the content is really, really useful. One thing I would suggest as an improvement is that where there are mentions of studies or research, that these are correctly cited.
The majority of the information was good and affirming. It gave confirmation and validation to the work that I am already doing. The only request that I have to offer is that someone go through each module and correct all of the typos. There was a lot. I found a lot of repeated words, even in the exams. I also feel like the writer could use a larger vocabulary to highlight key and important points. For instance, the word "critical" was used excessively. I only mention this because it caused a bit of confusion for me, as I tried to digest the information and determine what was important.
