I would’ve thought by now there would be a much more glamorous way to present material. Rather than videos, you basically get an e-book with an audio track and there’s no way to keep them in sync. Every time you have to stop the audio, you lose your place in the e-book. There’s also no way to hot-key through the material or skip to pages - for instance, to find the place where you stopped last time. So every time you start a session, you have to find where you were in the ebook, restart the audiotape and play it back to the place where you left off. This is absolutely moronic in the year 2026. (Also, the person who voiced the recordings mispronounces words at an alarming rate, including scientific terms that are quite germane to the course.) Had I realized that the material was not presented as videos, I would not have signed up for this class. The e-books are terribly thorough, however, and have great information. It’s a shame that they can’t figure out a modern way to present it.
I can not see how this course can be applied in practical life
Though i finished another course on positive pshychology and was absolutely thilled with it, this one is very academic and i do not understand so far how this can be used and when. More like repetition of the school program.
Does the idea of a tree being a sentient being resonate deeply with you? Have you heard of egregores? Do you believe in Gaia, the Earth Mother? If you answered yes, then this course may be of interest to you. So far, I have completed the first two modules and have noticed a lack of citations for the studies referred to in the reading, as well as a bias towards mysticism and pseudoscience. I paid $97 for this course, and so far, I am disappointed. I hoped for a framework for sylvanotherapy or suggested techniques. Fair warning, the first two modules will most likely shock you (or possibly amuse you) if you are more of a rationalist and a proponent of the scientific method.
There was lots of good content in this course including templates as well. It is clear the course is very knowledgeable. The actual delivery of the course was really poor - it was just really long handouts to read. Considering I do have ADHD, I thought it was ironic that the delivery method did not aid my ADHD whatsoever. Having different VAK learning preferences would have been more beneficial to meet the needs of not only myself but other candidates.
The process is extremely painful and could use some more thought on the end user points. The idea is good but from someone that completes a lot of additional learning and completes a lot of courses I have found this extremely tick and flick without the ability to transfer learnings from content to exam and it is purely designed for copy paste results to reduce markings and personal touch. I wish you luck moving forward but I doubt I would return in the future.
Some of the information given is inaccurate. The concept that lifestyle decisions, such as diet, exercise and sleep quality is amplified beyond reality. The idea that we can affect the DNA replication, expression, translation and post-translation modification of proteins simply by eating well and exercise is appealing but inaccurate
This is geared more toward therapy than coaching. Diagnosis and treatment of addiction, associated medications and hotlines....nothing related to neuro-coaching.
Just completed module 3 and as I am going through everything, I like the information but its not enough to actually work with clients. As an example, the case studies are great and I love how detailed they are with the back and forth and the processes. I hope one day I can be like that, but this course does not provide that kind of detail. Instead, I get word salad definitions that don't explain anything and often leave out key terms, definitions and "HOW TO" do what is in the case studies.
Honestly, I will continue the course because I paid for it, I am learning some things and brushing up on others I know. I believe I will have to take an advanced course in biohacking if I want to actually take on clients. I am glad I got to leave this review because I was probably about to take this to the forums and discuss with other students on direction from here.
Play Therapy - good course but a little boring to follow
As much as I enjoy an online course Im finding it hard to stay engaged with reading through the content and then answering questions. I would like there to be more engagement and activities
The course is more science based rather than practical and how to truly apply it to customers. I am in the earlier lessons, so possibly it is building a foundation that will help with the day-to-day implementation.
Honestly, it's really hard to get through. It's very dry and very repetitive. It only has some specific advice and I have to weed through a lot to get through it. The quizzes are hard to predict and sometimes the questions are confusing.
