Not impressed
This is not what I expected the course to be at all
Verified reviews
Verified reviews from students across every school on Naturalistico.
4.84
This is not what I expected the course to be at all
I thought the course wouldve been more engaging with a bigger community, and teacher present. but this is just like reading a book on your own.
Does the idea of a tree being a sentient being resonate deeply with you? Have you heard of egregores? Do you believe in Gaia, the Earth Mother? If you answered yes, then this course may be of interest to you. So far, I have completed the first two modules and have noticed a lack of citations for the studies referred to in the reading, as well as a bias towards mysticism and pseudoscience. I paid $97 for this course, and so far, I am disappointed. I hoped for a framework for sylvanotherapy or suggested techniques. Fair warning, the first two modules will most likely shock you (or possibly amuse you) if you are more of a rationalist and a proponent of the scientific method.
Not that happy
There was lots of good content in this course including templates as well. It is clear the course is very knowledgeable. The actual delivery of the course was really poor - it was just really long handouts to read. Considering I do have ADHD, I thought it was ironic that the delivery method did not aid my ADHD whatsoever. Having different VAK learning preferences would have been more beneficial to meet the needs of not only myself but other candidates.
The process is extremely painful and could use some more thought on the end user points. The idea is good but from someone that completes a lot of additional learning and completes a lot of courses I have found this extremely tick and flick without the ability to transfer learnings from content to exam and it is purely designed for copy paste results to reduce markings and personal touch. I wish you luck moving forward but I doubt I would return in the future.
Some of the information given is inaccurate. The concept that lifestyle decisions, such as diet, exercise and sleep quality is amplified beyond reality. The idea that we can affect the DNA replication, expression, translation and post-translation modification of proteins simply by eating well and exercise is appealing but inaccurate
confiuse
This is geared more toward therapy than coaching. Diagnosis and treatment of addiction, associated medications and hotlines....nothing related to neuro-coaching.
Just completed module 3 and as I am going through everything, I like the information but its not enough to actually work with clients. As an example, the case studies are great and I love how detailed they are with the back and forth and the processes. I hope one day I can be like that, but this course does not provide that kind of detail. Instead, I get word salad definitions that don't explain anything and often leave out key terms, definitions and "HOW TO" do what is in the case studies. Honestly, I will continue the course because I paid for it, I am learning some things and brushing up on others I know. I believe I will have to take an advanced course in biohacking if I want to actually take on clients. I am glad I got to leave this review because I was probably about to take this to the forums and discuss with other students on direction from here.
As much as I enjoy an online course Im finding it hard to stay engaged with reading through the content and then answering questions. I would like there to be more engagement and activities
The course is more science based rather than practical and how to truly apply it to customers. I am in the earlier lessons, so possibly it is building a foundation that will help with the day-to-day implementation.
Honestly, it's really hard to get through. It's very dry and very repetitive. It only has some specific advice and I have to weed through a lot to get through it. The quizzes are hard to predict and sometimes the questions are confusing.
Content is OK, although there are gaps in the material, and at times it mentions concepts not previously explained. In addition, the illustrations, though beautiful and colourful, frequently do not actually add anything to the material or assist in understanding. They seem to be included to look pretty, which i find a huge missed opportunity.
I think it would be really nice if the written nformation was broken up more and included some lectures/ conversations and art demonstrations on video. It is very dry for such a creative topic, although I can see the modules are well written they could be the back up information rather than the only information.
A few studies are mentioned by name, but generally speaking this course does not cite its source material. It is written in a conversational tone at times that seems to be written by a non-native English speaker using a lot of fluff words. I would prefer a course with links to scientific research. Needs to be more in depth.
Verified reviews
Every school here teaches to the same certified standard. Open one to read its reviews and see what it offers.
Thank you for subscribing.